




|  |
Kogan, J.R., Pinto-Powell
R., Brown, L.A., Hemmer, P., Bellini, L.M., Peltier, D. The Impact
of Resident Duty Hours Reform on the Internal Medicine Core Clerkship: Results
from the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Survey. Academic Medicine
2006 81(12):1038-44. Reviewed by Judith L. Rowen, University
of Texas Galveston What is the problem and what is known
about it so far? Residents serve as important role models and teachers for students
on core clerkships. With ACGME mandated work hour restrictions, it is conceivable
that residents may cut back on the amount of teaching they offer to students.
The impact of duty hours on the residents themselves has been studied, with mixed
results. Little data are available concerning the impact of duty hours on the
teaching offered by the residents to students. Why did the researchers
do this particular study? To add to the body of knowledge concerning the impact
of duty hours restrictions on medical student education, specifically with a focus
on the impact on student clerkships from the perspective of clerkship directors.
Who was studied? Clerkship directors in Internal Medicine
How was the study done? The Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) circulates
an annual questionnaire to its membership; investigators are invited to submit
potential topics/questions to be surveyed with the annual instrument in addition
to standard demographic questions. The 2004 survey addressed the issue of the
impact of resident duty hours reform on teaching, feedback and evaluation, patient
care and student attitudes during the IM clerkship, using 5-point Likert scale
items and 4 open-ended items. The survey was distributed to 114 members.
What did the researchers find? The response rate on the survey was 84%. Overall,
69.7% of the queried clerkship directors disagreed or strongly disagreed that
duty hours reform had a positive impact on the educational experience of clerkship
students. This general attitude was reflected in the responses to individual questions
concerning resident time and attitudes for teaching, feedback and evaluation of
students, and the impact on the patient care experiences for students. Responses
to the Likert-scale items and open ended questions revealed special concern that
students were learning "shift-work mentality" with subsequent erosion
of professionalism, and that students' continuity with the team or patients was
being compromised. When asked to name the most positive effect of duty hours reform
on student education, 25% said there was no positive effect, with others noting
that having more rested residents might improve the students' experience. The
survey also asked whether changes had been made in the clerkship in response to
resident duty hours restrictions, and other than some decrease in the requirement
for overnight call, few programs made substantive changes. What were
the limitations of the study? This survey provides the perspective of clerkship
directors, not the actual students or residents involved in the teaching interaction
being studied. Although the opinions of clerkship directors are obviously important
and may provide a broader perspective over time, this may not tell the whole story.
Whether these data apply to other types of clerkships besides Internal Medicine
is unknown. What were the implications of the study? Yet one more
study that points out that resident duty hours restrictions may have unintended
consequences. We need to keep looking at this issue, especially as new staffing
models are implemented. We also need to plan ahead for the likely institution
of such duty hours restrictions for the students - we should have "before
and after" studies ready to go and learn from what has gone on during the
institution of restrictions for residents. Some prophylactic attempts to shore
up altruism and the other components of professionalism against the onslaught
of "shift work mentality" should be designed.
(Editorial
comment: It is not altogether surprising that Clerkship Directors in IM are pessimistic
about the effect of resident duty hours on medical student teaching. It is intriguing
that the Directors felt that modeling "shift-work" was one of the major
issues rather than say time for feedback or direct observation. Regardless, whether
in the inpatient or outpatient setting, there are enormous pressures on teaching
time and clerkships and educators will need to explore different models of teaching.
Bill Raszka) |